1) Redpath is and was the Chief Executive Officer of the Libertarian National Committee. As such, under LNC Bylaws Article 7, Section 4 "The Chair is the chief executive officer of the Party with full authority to direct its business and affairs...subject to express National Committee policies and directives..."

In accord with its authority Under Article 8 of the Bylaws, the LNC has voted a series of policies. These National Committee policies from the current LNC Policy Manual, are listed in part below as Appendix A.  The next several articles will examine what are in my opinion failures to follow these requirements, failures for which Redpath has not been sanctioned, leading to the conclusion that Keaton should not be sanctioned for her less serious actions.

We first turn to Policy Manual ARTICLE III. B. "The Chair serves as chief executive officer of the Party, reporting to the LNC, and in that capacity:
1.    is responsible, along with the LNC, for ensuring the direction and management of activities, affairs, properties, and funds of the Party is consistent with the Party Bylaws and LNC policies;..."

The most important of these bylaws statements is of course the Statement of Principles, eschewing the use of theft and fraud for political gain.

I begin with what is in my opinion an attempted use of theft and fraud, broadly defined as intended by the original authors of the statement of principles, for political gain, by the LNC, an attempt that in my opinion could not be continuing if Redpath had discharged his duties under B.1.  However, Redpath has not been sanctioned for what appear to be his failures here, so Keaton should also not be sanctioned.

I refer to the LNC lawsuit attempting to steal my ballot status in New Hampshire.

1.  In my opinion there can be no reasonable doubt that this is an LNC action, even though the LNC is not yet named as a plaintiff in the suit.  First, the non-local attorney in the suit represented himself to me as having the LNC as his client.  Furthermore, I am assured by eyewitnesses at an LPNH meeting after the suit was filed that LPNH state committee members did not know who the non-local attorney was, and, if this is true, it is scarcely credible that he was retained by LPNH.  Also, the LPNH vote to adhere to the suit reads

"From: Brendan Kelly <brendanfklpnh@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:59 PM
To: Seth Cohn <scohn@lpnh.org>, babiarz@endor.com, "Sandy C. Pierre" <scitarel@yahoo.com>, Faith Cook <faithecook@yahoo.com>, Avens O'Brien <aobrien@lpnh.org>
At about 2:00 PM Aug.27th 2008 I'm calling a meeting of the LPNH E.C. for the purpose of addressing the question of our joining with national LP in their substitution suit. This meeting will be open until 2:00 PM on Aug. 28th 2008 or until an unbeatable up or down vote with a quorum has been reached.All internet response should be sent by reply all.I Brendan Kelly as chairman call this meeting to order. I'd like to make a motion that the LPNH join the LP substitution law suit to be filed as plaintiff's. Do I have a second."

That is a motion purely and entirely to join 'the national LP' suit. No attorney, presented with this motion, could have added LPNH as a plaintiff, as has been done, unless this was a national LP suit.

2. Point 15 of the LNC suit as filed reads  15: "Upon information and belief, anticipating that he might win the nomination but have insufficient time to obtain the 3,000 valid nomination papers required for access to the New Hampshire ballot, Phillies caused the requisite number of nominating papers to be circulated and filed on his behalf prior to the convention."

These claims are false.  Presenting them was an act of fraud in the sense of the statement of principles, though perhaps not as a matter of law.  The National Chair was not sanctioned for allowing this act of fraud to go forward, and therefore Keaton should not be sanctioned for her alleged acts, which were clearly less serious.

Why are the claims false? In Spring, 2007, LPNH staged a nominating convention. You can read about it in the LPNH newsletter Libertarian Lines, Volume 32, Issue 3 http://www.lpnh.org/LPNH/Libertarian_Lines_files/LibLines_June07.pdf .  I didn't attend the convention, but my campaign Treasurer Carol McMahon did.   Liberty Lines page 1, bottom, "Nominations" says in part "The main item for the convention was candidate nominations for President down to Executive Council.  We made nominations for each of these offices...In the end, our final list of nominees were: President: George Phillies,"  Having identified me as a candidate, Liberty Lines then twice says "please start collecting petitions for our candidates."  

It was the LPNH State Convention that asked its volunteers to collect signatures for me. The claim that I caused nominating papers to be circulated and filed is a baldfaced lie.  However, our National Chair has not been sanctioned for allowing these false claims to go forward, and therefore Angela Keaton should also not be sanctioned for less serious acts.

3. Point 21 of the LNC lawsuit claims "The plaintiffs have sought to substitute the Barr candidacy for the Phillies candidacy and to have Barr listed on the November ballot as the sole Libertarian candidate for President."  Point 22. claims in part "The Secretary of State has refused to permit such substitution..."

These claims are also false.  Presenting them was an act of fraud in the sense of the statement of principles.  The National Chair was not sanctioned by the LNC for allowing these false claims to go forward, and therefore Keaton should not be sanctioned for her alleged acts, which were clearly less serious.

Why are these claims false?  First, Barr is already on the ballot, and therefore the proposed change is not "substitution"; it is my removal from the ballot.  Furthermore, at no time prior to the LPNH ExComm vote to join the lawsuit did the LPNH ExComm vote to ask Secretary Gardner for anything of the kind.

4. Point 23 of the LPNH lawsuit claims that failure "to list Barr on the Libertarian ballot as the sole Libertarian Party candidate for President" would "unduly burdens their rights to cast their votes effectively" and "to associate for the advancement of political beliefs".

The claim that you cannot vote effectively because someone else is on the ballot is absurd on its face.  In fact, if this suit were to succeed, the right of attendees of the LPNH State Convention, not to mention my petitioners and supporters, to associate for the advancement of their political beliefs, would be stolen.  This taking would be an act of theft in the sense of the statement of principles, if perhaps not in the legal sense. The National Chair was not sanctioned by the LNC for allowing this attempted theft of freedom of association to go forward, and therefore Keaton should not be sanctioned for her alleged acts, which were clearly less serious.

You may correctly assume that I could go on at great length about this suit, but I think I have made my point.

We'll return in Part 5 to other LNC member acts whose actions were more serious than Ms. Keaton's.

Appendix A.  Segments from the LNC Policy Manual.

I first quote from the Policy Manual as to the duties charged by LNC vote to the LNC Chair:

ARTICLE III. OFFICERS
Section 1: POSITION DESCRIPTION OF NATIONAL CHAIR
A.    The Chair serves as the presiding officer of the LNC and of all National Conventions and, in that capacity:
1.    guides the deliberations and activities of the LNC according to Party Bylaws, convenes an LNC meeting according to the Party Bylaws, serves as a full voting member of the LNC and serves as a nonvoting member of all committees appointed by the LNC;
2.    guides the deliberations and activities of National Conventions according to the Party Bylaws and adopted Convention Rules.
B.    The Chair serves as chief executive officer of the Party, reporting to the LNC, and in that capacity:
1.    is responsible, along with the LNC, for ensuring the direction and management of activities, affairs, properties, and funds of the Party is consistent with the Party Bylaws and LNC policies;...
C.    The Chair represents and serves as the chief spokesman of the Party as appropriate, including: representing the Party to the public, including the business community, media, other political and educational organizations, government agencies, and elected officials;

not to mention

ARTICLE VII. LP NEWS
Section 1: LP NEWS EDITORIAL POLICY
Article VII.1.C.2 The selection of articles, their layout and the graphics for LP News, the relative amount of space assigned to articles, advertisements, Party announcements, and regular features shall be the responsibility of the Chair except as detailed in this Policy Statement.

The exception for the LP News Editor makes clear that the responsibility of the Editor is for production, so that VII.1.A. 2. provides
Final responsibility for the production of LP News must rest with one person: the Editor. It is the responsibility of the Editor to produce the best possible publication within the guidelines of these policies.

Among the LNC policies that the Chair is responsible for carrying out are

Article VIII. Section 3: LIMITATIONS ON PARTY SUPPORT FOR PUBLIC OFFICE
Party resources shall not be used to provide information or services for any candidate for public office prior to the nomination unless: (a) such information or services are available and announced on an equal basis to all Libertarians who have declared they are seeking that nomination, (b) such information or services are generally available and announced to all party members, or (c) the service or candidate has been approved by the state chair.

Article VIII. Section 4: LIMITATIONS ON PARTY SUPPORT FOR PARTY OFFICE
Party resources shall not be used to provide information or services for any candidate for party office unless: (a) such information or services are available and announced on an equal basis to all Libertarians who have declared they are seeking that office, or (b) such information or service(s) are generally available and announced all party members.

and