Support Your Libertarian Party


Diary

By jakeporter
Posted on Tue Aug 14, 2007 at 7:29 PM EST

Recently, many Libertarians have decided they do not wish to support any of the 2008 Libertarian Party Presidential candidates. In fact, many libertarians have became very hostile to people very committed to building a strong Libertarian Party.

Recently, many Libertarians have decided they do not wish to support any of the 2008 Libertarian Party Presidential candidates. In fact, many libertarians have became very hostile to people very committed to building a strong Libertarian Party. I have heard from many people who have claimed the Libertarian Party Presidential are running against Ron Paul, the Libertarian Party can endorse Ron Paul for the Republican nomination, or that the Libertarian Party candidates should drop out until Ron Paul fails to win the Republican nomination. Before we go any further, I want to make known that I wish Ron Paul the best, but I have no interest in giving up on the Libertarian Party. Support Ron Paul if you wish, but please also support your Libertarian Party. Many Libertarians are not supporting the Libertarian Party Presidential candidates and this decision may harm the party.

As National Mobilization Facilitator for the George Phillies 2008 Presidential campaign, I have been hearing questions for many angry libertarians. They ask questions such as, "Why are you running against Ron Paul?" Additional comments have been very hostile and suggest the Libertarian Party should not run a Presidential candidate in 2008. Not running a candidate for President in 2008 would be political suicide and anyone who suggest that we should not run a Presidential candidate in 2008 does not have the interest of the Libertarian Party in mind. While working for the George Phillies Presidential campaign I have heard many questions regarding the Libertarian Party's 2008 Presidential nomination.

One myth is that our current Presidential candidates are running against Ron Paul. Actually, the Libertarian Party Presidential candidates are not running against Ron Paul anymore than Ron Paul is running against any Libertarian Party Presidential candidates. In fact, many of these candidates declared their intention to run for President long before Ron Paul declared he was running. Furthermore, Ron Paul is running for the nomination of the Republican Party while George Phillies, Christine Smith, Steve Kubby, and others are running for the nomination of the Libertarian Party. In conclusion, Ron Paul and the 2008 Libertarian Presidential candidates are not running against each other, but for the Presidential nomination of their own political party.

Another myth is that the Libertarian Party can support Ron Paul for the Republican nomination. Now, we will take a look at what the Libertarian Party bylaws say about this issue.

Article 6, 4: No affiliate party shall endorse any candidate who is a member of another party for public office in any partisan election. No affiliate party shall take any action inconsistent with the Statement of Principles or these Bylaws.

Libertarians often become very angry when Congress violates the United States Constitution. The Libertarian Party bylaws should be treated no differently. Additionally, I am told that many states have laws, not state party bylaws, but actual legislative law prohibiting one party endorsing a candidate of another party, or a candidate to be nominated by more than one party. I would need to look more into this to find out if it is true, but I have been told it is so. The Libertarian Party cannot, without violating our own bylaws, support a candidate for the Republican Presidential nomination.

Additionally, I am asked why we are running a Presidential campaign before the Republicans and Democrats decide their nominee. The answer is simple; many candidates decided to run many months before Ron Paul decided to run. They should not be expected to stop their campaign and wait a year until the Republicans decide their Presidential candidate. The time to build the Libertarian Party was yesterday and putting this task on hold is a losing proposition. I know for a fact that we at the Phillies campaign have worked to revive many dying state organizations. A Republican or Democrat, not matter how libertarian they may be, cannot revive dying state organizations. The Libertarian Party cannot wait for the Republicans and Democrats to nominate their Presidential candidates.

The Libertarian Party needs to run Presidential candidates for purposes such as local organization. All local candidates benefit when there is a candidate at the top advertising the party. Additionally, the Libertarian Party needs to run a candidate for purposes such as ballot access. Without a Libertarian Presidential candidate working to revive state organizations, and being on the ballot to help secure ballot access for the states, the Libertarian Party in many states may receive their death sentence and have it carried out shortly after the 2008 election. The Libertarian Party must run a Presidential candidate to build strong local organization.

Many libertarians are not supporting the Libertarian Party. I wish Ron Paul the best, but I will stick to supporting my Libertarian Party because one lone libertarian running as a Democratic or Republican will not get us a small, libertarian government. Support Ron Paul if you wish, but please also support your Libertarian Party, the party which will survive no matter who the Republican and Democratic nominees for President are.

Is your pit crew on your side? (5.00 / 1) (#1)
by all4thinking on Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 1:34 PM EST
There is a tendency abroad in the LP to see ourselves as just a more intelligent, less corrupted, more principled, version of the Republican Party.  With this mindset, it is a very short leap indeed for folks to feel that the Ron Paul candidacy is the voice of the finally-renovated, newly-inspired, morally-renewed, Republican Party that the LP members can finally go back to in good conscience.

One little problem.  That only takes care of part of the issues that Libertarianism raises.  Those Libertarians who came to the Party of Individual Freedom and Personal Responsibility from the other side of the aisle do not see even this new instantiation of the GOP making any headway towards stopping government intervention in the personal lives of its citizens.  Yes, there are comments about getting the Federal government out of our lives, but just by moving the problem down to lower levels; not by getting government out of our personal choices altogether; not real separation of church and state.

We need a candidate that represents more of the Libertarian message, and one that sticks to their principles, and sticks to their party when it really counts.  We need a Libertarian candidate.  Anyone not already in the GOP camp can't do anything to guarantee a nomination there (caucuses are set), and having another entire party available to continue the discussion of principles in detail, as all of the campaigns go around the country,  will get the word out in even more places that this country is ready for a far more Libertarian government.

The other little problem is that there is a massive optimism about the ability of one person to make substantive changes in our massive and currently corrupt government.  While there may be changes made in the GOP to support some of the new directions, there are so many powerful interests allied against real change, that we desperately need a party not held in place by corporate donations (which cannot be said of the major parties any more), capable of fielding candidates for Congress who can be there to push in new, more Libertarian directions, and who are not beholden to corporate interests.

We can't change how a broken racecar behaves by putting a different person at the wheel.  The engine needs overhauling; the tires need balancing; the oil needs to be changed;  the windshield wipers and their washer fluid need to work so we can see ahead clearly.   In the case of a broken race car (or a government out of control), the driver needs a good pit crew; he can't be a specialist in everything, and if he's going to out-maneuver the rest of the contenders trying to knock him out, he (whoever is elected president)  can't get out of the car and do all this himself and expect to come out ahead.  And lots of fans can't make it happen either.

And, if you follow racing at all, you must know that pit crews are made up of folks you TRUST.  When you are a candidate for President and find the folks in Congress all belonged to a previous pit crew, who've been funded by your opponents in the past, are you sure you trust them?

We have a lot of folks who understand Libertarian principles in the LP.  Many have already run for office, without much support from other Libertarians.  Now that the public is starting to show respect for Libertarian values, suddenly there's a push to let the LP die off.  Convenient for those who are seeing it as a new threat to their power.  

If you aren't fond of the current LP (you meaning any libs out there, not just the writer I'm responding to), then get off the typewriter and volunteer to DO something about it.  Those who are supporting the non-Lib candidate have at least gotten off their duffs and are out there fighting for their choice.  

If you believe that major party will do the right thing and get us a libertarian in the White House, go for it.  

If you don't, then take out your calendar, and your checkbook and get registered for National LP Convention where you can get things re-oriented as your Libertarian values dictate; or consider running for office yourself (sign up for the pit crew).  Talk won't work for this one.  Even if you support a non-Lib candidate, you need to find people for Congress to help, or you're just replacing the race car driver and cheering from the stands.

The LP won't go away.  Too much is at stake, and we are finally seeing some real interest out there in the public.  I talk to a LOT of people, and I have not heard more than 5% who are registered  in a major political party tell me they are happy with their choices.  They all say they'd be Libertarian except for (their pet concern here), and when I ask if their major party covers all of their issues, they get nervous, and finally say no.  People are SO close.  Walking out on those who are starting to see a glimmer of hope would be playing into the hands of Liberty's enemies at a time when the people really want what we have to give.

           -Eva
The man who writes about himself and his own time is the only man who writes about all people and all time (G. B. Shaw)

[Ratings note: Rate 1 for the most undesirable comments, 5 for the best comments. Pushing "Rate All" will submit any ratings you may have set. Rating controls don't appear for your own comments.]

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:

Related Links

+ jakeporter's Diary